September 11, 2013

Is Spurgeon Right?

Stephen Nichols
Is Spurgeon Right?


If you have been counting, we are at our fifth episode. We have reached a milestone. I thought it would be helpful to pause here and ask, Why are we doing this? Why are we looking to the past? Why, in other words, bother with church history?

I suspect I'm preaching to the choir. You're listening because you already know the answer. You know why we need to spend some time in the past and listen to the voices from church history. But it doesn't hurt to spend some time thinking about this question. Even choirs need to be reminded from time to time. So, back to our question: Why church history, why is it important?

For the answer, I want to go back to the eighteen hundreds and I want to go back to London. I want to go to Charles Haddon Spurgeon. Now, I like Spurgeon for a lot of reasons, but I especially like him because he helps me with my friends from the different aisles. Or should I say, my friends from the different pews. Spurgeon is great for my Baptist friends because he was a Baptist. But he is also great for my Presbyterian friends because he smoked cigars, and my Lutheran friends love him because he is a nineteenth-century reincarnation of Martin Luther himself. So there you have it, Spurgeon rules.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon pastored the Metropolitan Tabernacle, a great church in a great part of London known as "Elephant and Castle." The Londoners would flock to hear Spurgeon preach. In fact, people even travelled the Atlantic to hear him preach. He wrote many sermons of course, while he was at the Metropolitan Tabernacle. And Spurgeon also wrote many books. In one of his many books, Spurgeon made a comment well worth hearing. It comes from the preface to his book on commentaries. A book he wrote for pastors to convince them of the need to use commentaries and to engage in deep study for their sermon preparation. Spurgeon well knew the value of reading for preaching. He had a personal library of around 25,000 books. And this in the eighteen hundreds! And what's more, he actually read most of them.

Well, in the preface to his book, he speaks to an objection to using commentaries. The objection goes something like this: As a Christian, I have the Holy Spirit. And I have his wonderful work of illumination. I don't need commentaries, I don't need to rely on the thoughts of others, I can go right to the source.

Now, here's Spurgeon's answer to that objection. And I quote, "I find it odd that he who thinks so highly of what the Holy Spirit teaches him, thinks so little of what the Holy Spirit teaches others also."

In this quote, Spurgeon reminds us that the Holy Spirit is not an individual gift. The Holy Spirit is a corporate gift to the body of Christ, and he has taught others, and uses others to teach us. So Spurgeon's argument reaches the conclusion: use commentaries. Don't be arrogant, and don't think you have a corner on the market of the Holy Spirit—you don't.

Now, let's expand Spurgeon's argument and apply it to the church today and its relationship to church history. Here's my paraphrase of Spurgeon's argument: I find it odd that the church of the 21st century thinks so highly of what the Holy Spirit has taught it today that it thinks so little of what the Holy Spirit has taught the church in the first century, the second, the third, the forth, and so on, and so on.

The Holy Spirit is not unique to our age. The Holy Spirit has been at work in the church for the past 21 centuries. We could put the matter this way—it is rather prideful to think that we have nothing to learn from the past. And remember, pride is a sin. And also remember, as Scripture says, "pride comes before a fall." We need a little humility. Enough humility to say we may not have all the answers in the present. Enough humility to say, we need the past, and enough humility to visit it from time to time, even if it is only for 5 minutes.